Home

Pork Pantry
Our consumer pages answer all your questions about pork.  Also try our  mouth-watering recipes..

SAPPO
About SAPPO
Contact us
Latest news
History
Objectives
Mission and vision
Structure
Why should I join?

Functions
Communication
Promotions
Serological tests
Residue tests
Research
MH gene
Market information

Provincial organisations
KwaZulu Natal PPO
Western Cape PPA
Free State PPA
Premier Pork Producers

Pig Study groups
Limpopo PSG
Magaliesburg PSG
Northern Free State PSG
North West PSG
Gauteng PSG

Other role players
Pig Vet Society
Pig Breeders' Society
ARC-AII

Meet our input suppliers

Article archive

Economic impact of strategies to increase pig weaning age

By Steve S. Dritz, Rodger G. Main, Mike D. Tokach, Robert D. Goodband, and Jim L. Nelssen - Kansas State University, USA

The development of multi-site production systems has encouraged the financial performance for each phase of production (sow, nursery, finishing or wean-to-finish) to be independently evaluated.

The sow farm is either a cost or a profit center depending on if ownership of the weaned pig is transferred at weaning. Regardless of being a cost or profit center, sow farm revenue and production costs are typically calculated on a per weaned pig basis. In contrast, other phases of production use weight to derive cost and revenue. Thus, the accepted standard for measuring cost and revenue assumes that all weaned pigs meeting minimum standards have equal value.  

These accepted accounting practices generally encourage a reduction in lactation length and weaning age because increasing weekly farrowings will typically increase pigs weaned per week. With only a fixed amount of lactation space is available, the increase in litters farrowed each week results in weaning age being reduced. We believe these practices have lead to the utilisation of relatively short lactation lengths (16 to 18 d) in large segments of the North American swine industry.

These practices drive down weaned pig cost based on the assumption that regardless of weaning age or weight weaned pig value is the same. Therefore, we embarked on a project over the last several years to measure the impact of lactation length on postweaning growth performance and develop an economic framework for evaluating changes in lactation length have on whole herd profit (Main et al. 2004, 2005a,b).

These experiments were completed with pigs originating from a 7 300-head sow farm with pigs flowing into single source, all-in all out nursery and finishing sites. In Trial 1, treatments included weaning litters of pigs at 12, 15, 18, or 21 days of age. In Trial 2, litters were weaned at 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, or 22 days of age. This resulted in three wean age treatments (15.5, 18.5, and 21.5 days of age, i.e., 15.5 days = 50% 15 day pigs, and 50% 16 day pigs).

Litters were ear notched at birth (18 to 20 litters/day of weaning age in each block), and all pigs were subsequently individually ear-tagged, weighed, and gender recorded three days prior to weaning. Each trial had four blocks. Each block consisted of all weaning age treatments weaned on the same day into the same nursery. Each block remained intact as pigs were transferred from nursery to finishing site.

In both trials there were linear improvements in nursery growth rate and mortality (Table 1 and 2). This resulted in a significant linear improvement in d 42 after weaning weight and weight per day of age.  Pigs were evaluated for growth rate and mortality in the subsequent finishing period (Table 3 and 4). Finisher ADG was again improved linearly in both trials but mortality was unaffected as weaning age increased.

Table 1. Influence of weaning age on nursery performance in trial 1a

Item

Trial 1 weaning age a

Probability (P<)

 

12

15

18

21

SE

Linear

Quad

Allotment weight, kg

3.4

4.3

4.9

5.7

0.05

0.001

0.77

ADG, g

299

368

409

474

7

0.001

0.66

ADFI, g

426

511

565

654

11

0.001

0.64

Gain/feed

0.70

0.72

0.73

0.72

0.01

0.001

0.03

Mortality, %

5.2

2.8

2.1

0.5

0.76

0.001

0.55

D 42 post-weaning, kg

16.9

20.3

22.6

25.8

0.26

0.001

0.6

D 42 post weaning weight per d of age,g

313

356

377

410

4

0.001

0.08

a2272 pigs with 34 or 36 pigs per pen (50% barrows, 50% gilts), and 16 replications (pens) per treatment, or a total of 64 pens on test

Table 2. Influence of weaning age on nursery performance in trial 2a

Item

Trial 1 weaning age b

 

Probability (P<)

 

15.5

18.5

21.5

SE

Linear

Quad

Allotment weight, kg

4.1

4.8

5.6

0.09

0.001

0.001

ADG, g

435

481.5

525

14

0.001

0.70

ADFI, g

565

631.5

701

15

0.001

0.79

Gain/feed

0.77

0.76

0.75

0.005

0.001

0.69

Mortality, %

2.2

1.6

1.3

0.5

0.001

0.69

D 42 post-weaning, kg

22.9

25.4

28.1

0.64

0.001

0.57

D 42 post weaning weight per d of age,g

398

420

442

10

0.001

0.91

a3456 pigs with 36 pigs per pen (18 barrows, 18 gilts), and 16 replications (pens) per

treatment, or a total of 96 pens on test

Table 3. Influence of weaning age on finishing and wean to finish performance, Trial 1a

 

Weaning age

 

Probability (<P)

Item

12

15

18

21

SE

Linear

Quad

Finishing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADG, g

722

728

736

768

11

0.002

0.19

Mortality , %

4.4

5.2

4.8

3.1

0.94

0.32

0.19

Wean to Finish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADG, g

580

616

637

687

8

0.001

0.36

Mortality, %

9.9

7.9

6.8

3.7

0.95

0.001

0.39

Weight, kg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off-test, d 156 postweaning

103.9

109.1

112.1

117.3

0.81

0.001

0.94

Sold per pig weaned, kg

94.1

100.5

104.4

113.1

1.30

0.001

0.35

a 1920 pigs were allotted from the nursery to the finishing phase of this study on d 42 post-weaning with 20 pigs (10 barrows, 10 gilts) per pen and 24 replications (pens) per treatment, or 96 pens on test.

Table 4. Influence of weaning age on finishing and wean to finish performance, Trial 2a

 

Weaning age

 

Probability (P<)

Item

15.5

18.5

21.5

SE

Linear

Quad

Finishing

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADG, g

782.5

789

805.5

12

0.003

0.58

Mortality , %

1.80

1.90

1.20

0.62

0.30

0.42

Wean to Finish

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADG, g

671

699

718

7

0.001

0.78

Mortality, %

4.95

2.99

2.77

0.69

0.03

0.69

Weight, kg

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off-test, d 156 postweaning

112.0

115.6

119.2

1.33

0.001

0.91

Sold per pig weaned, kg

106.9

111.8

115.7

1.2

0.001

0.70

a 3000 pigs were allotted from the nursery to the finishing phase of this study on d 42 post-weaning with 25 pigs (12 barrows, 13 gilts) per pen and 20 replications (pens) per treatment, or 120 pens on test.

Wean to finish growth rate and mortality were linearly improved in both trials. These improvements in growth rate resulted in linear improvements in off-test weight on d 156 after weaning in Trial 1 and d 153 after weaning in trial 2. As an additional measure to evaluate the impact of weaning age the mortality and off test average weight were combined to calculate a weight sold per pig weaned. Again, the weight sold per pig weaned was linearly improved with increasing weaning age in both trials.

There were several striking observations from the trial. The first was the consistency of the response across the two trials seemed to indicate that within this production system that the response was fairly predictable. Also, these data have been reproduced across several production systems in North America and has largely agreed with this data very well. The growth rate response appears to be more predictable than the mortality decrease. The mortality decrease appears to be highly dependant upon the baseline mortality of the production system.

The second striking observation was that these linear improvements in growth and mortality largely occur in the 42-day post-weaning period, with some ongoing growth improvements in the finishing phase. The major implications of this finding is that nursery exit weights at a fixed time after weaning can be easily monitored within a production system as an indirect measure of whether the expected growth rate improvements are being captured in the entire wean to finish period. Finally, this data also clearly indicates that when evaluating nursery performance mean and variability in lactation length need to be known to adequately benchmark the performance.

Due the consistency between trials, we developed regression equations to determine the slopes of the responses across the two trials (Table 5). Subsequently, we used these slopes to determine an economic model to evaluate the impact of lactation length and weaning age on costs and revenue (Main et al., 2005a).

Table 5. Linear rates of change as wean age increases from 15 to 21.5 days at $88/100 ($40/cwt) live weight market price

 

Rates of linear change per day increase in weaning age

Item

Change per day

SE

42-day post weaning weight, kg

0.89

0.02

Growth and economic performance, assuming limited growth-finish capacity

Off-test weight, kg

1.26

0.08

Weight sold per pig weaned, kg4

1.68

0.14

Cost per 100 kg (US$)

-$0.41

$0.05

Income over costs per pig weaned, (US$)

$0.58

$0.06

Growth and economic performance, assuming non-limited growth-finish capacity

Post-weaning days to common market weight

1.73

0.11

Weight sold per pig weaned, kg

0.50

0.13

Cost per 100 kg at common market weight, (US$)

-$0.31

$0.04

Income over costs per pig weaned, (US$)

$0.39

$0.06

Cost per head sold at a common market weight (US$)

-$0.37

$0.05

From these models we developed an impact on income or profitability per day of weaning age increase. These were determined to range from $0.58 per day in a finishing system (limited space) where a decrease in growth rate would reduce market weight to a value of $0.39 in a finishing system with adequate capacity to maintain an adequate market weight with slower growth rate.

Further economic analysis was performed to evaluate different strategies to manipulate lactation length through the increase in farrowing crate utilisation, construction of additional lactation space, or reduction in sow inventory (Main et al.2005b). The major conclusions from this world indicate that reducing sow inventory to reduce lactation lengths leads to little improvement in overall system profitability.

This is largely mediated through the reduction in inventory that leads to a lower number of pigs weaned. Although these pigs are heavier and grow faster, these improvements in efficiency do not make up for the reduced total number of pigs produced. Increasing farrowing crate utilisation has good return without additional capital inputs. 

However, on many farms crate utilisation can not be increased further. Although capital intensive, the marginal addition of additional farrowing crates results in increased growth and productivity of every pig produced from the farm. Our experience has indicated that the return for adding additional lactation spaces to increase lactation length, has a payback of less than two years in  many production systems.

Paper presented at the 2007 Manitoba Swine Seminar, held in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (31 January to 1 February 2007). Ian R. Seddon, Ph.D., Swine Specialist, 204-545 University Crescent, Animal Industry Branch, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5S6

Canada. Tel: +1 (204) 945-0353. Fax: +1 (204) 945-4327 E-mail: iseddon@gov.mb.ca